🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a privilege that authorities grant or deny at their discretion. This represents the implication of new regulations that the ruling administration is putting forward, which would determine when and where protests can occur, with possible imprisonment for those who disobey these limitations.

Gradual Weakening of Civil Liberties

Earlier governments had already undermined this essential right: the previous Tory administration had granted law enforcement sweeping additional powers, which international human rights organizations had censured as "serious and unjustified restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these incremental assaults on liberty have practically eliminated the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Exploiting Atrocity to Rationalize Crackdown

The latest limitations are being justified by citing last week's heinous anti-Jewish assault on a British Islamic center. There should be universal agreement that the security of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, employing this horrific incident as a pretext to suppress dissent is not only disconnected to that duty but perverts it.

"If you can't set boundaries at mass killing, you probably can't draw the line at democracy," observed a well-known American author, a statement that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Demonstration

Consider Britain's long tradition of protest and direct action against racism and fascism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the National Front. Many of these early protesters were branded as radicals in their era, even while they were fighting for the rights of marginalized groups.

Current Reality

In today's complex situation, here's what's actually occurring: Israel – a sovereign nation – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have characterized as systematic destruction. Its military actions have prompted the International Criminal Court to release legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his ex-military leader.

International public opinion has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a large percentage of the public believe Israel has probably committed war crimes. Most people would endorse a total prohibition on weapons exports to the nation, and approve the detention of the Israeli leader.

Suppressing Opposition

Having largely failed the argument, Israel's supporters are now seizing on a vile antisemitic crime to attempt to silence a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems involved in this attempt. Government officials have failed to implement extensive restrictions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to continue.

People who are protesting against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader crackdown on these protesters until now: extremely few protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities little justification to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Merging Jewish identity with the policies of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also harmful. The standard interpretation of antisemitism, accepted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been rightly challenged for potentially stifling valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its key examples: that "making Jewish people collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've reached a situation where law enforcement can propose that protests criticizing Israel's actions should be canceled because they might "inadvertently or deliberately" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have stated that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made political parties "implicated" in supposed mistreatment faced by Jewish communities.

Double Standards

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israel's army killed dozens of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from two years of daily atrocities that have taken tens of thousands of human lives. British political leaders and news organizations have barely concealed the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian life. This represents one of the boldest expressions of racism in contemporary society.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already crossed a concerning boundary by banning Palestine Action, a non-violent, human rights-focused activist collective. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been detained, mostly for carrying placards opposing genocide and supporting the banned organization. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; among them a former clergyman and the child of a World War II genocide survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped vilify pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader suggested that some were "connected to" other nations, while the sitting leader described such protests as anti-Jewish. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on freedom of expression in general.

Looking Ahead

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be given sweeping powers to control opposition. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors struggled, suffered and sacrificed their lives to establish our liberties. We may ultimately rue how casually we permitted them to slip away.