🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “utter hypocrisy” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders demands plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a proposed legislation that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and watered-down penalties for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“As an elected official, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated the anti-tobacco campaigner.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in circulation among civil society groups.

Global industry interference concerns

This occurs during expanded apprehension about industry interference with public health regulations. Last month, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of industry lobbying worldwide. Tobacco company fingerprints are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN high-level meeting,” said the tobacco industry watchdog.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure fails to be approved because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in individuals' health who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The tobacco control bill being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, the company recommends this be decreased to less than half “following international recommended threshold”, delayed for at least one year after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and attempt to encompass as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

BAT asks for the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The draft bill proposes sanctions for different infractions “extending from a fraction of annual sales to ten-year jail sentences”.

Business explanation

Through correspondence, the corporate leader of the Zambian branch says the corporation is focused on responsible corporate conduct” and “supports the objectives of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “certain measures can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the necessary effect for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “complete contradiction”, he commented.

“We exist in a international community. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and collect the yield and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to enrich myself and all the future family lines while my community's youth are perishing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had not caused companies to close, the advocate mentioned. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. It only protects the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative commented: “The company operates its operations according with current country statutes. Moreover, the corporation engages in the state's regulatory development in line with the appropriate structures which allow for interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, the representative commented, noting that young individuals should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We advocate for developing rules to realize planned population health targets, while accepting the variety of entitlements and duties on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which includes rising levels of black market activity”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.