🔗 Share this article

Recently, the game developers launched a fresh game mode called Casual Breakthrough. In essence, this option resembles the regular Breakthrough format but features several notable adjustments:

• Every squad has just 8 real players, with the remaining filled by AI-controlled opponents.
• Activities done by human gamers grant complete experience points, while AI activities offer reduced XP.
• Only two maps can be played: Siege of Cairo and Empire State.
• Features like Dogtags, accolades, and career stat updates are disabled.

So essentially, the playlist delivers on its name: it offers a laid-back version of Breakthrough. On the surface, one could assume it's a good idea, as it gives more options for players seeking alternative methods to have fun with the game. However, if video games have taught us anything, it's that you can't please everyone. In other words, many BF6 players are upset.

Player Responses: Anger to Praise

"Gamers prefer real players. Don't repeat the errors of your rivals," states one reply to the official announcement. "Truly disappointing concept," says a different user. At the same time, on the Battlefield subreddit, one user notes, "It's unclear where we are going with this game," and another details everything they believe to be broken in Battlefield 6: "Resolve glitches, address drone issues, fix IVF rockets, adjust aiming after sprinting, improve hit detection. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

However, for every complaint, some gamers sharing how much they're enjoying the recent addition. "It's very fun to practice, real players keep it from being a complete grind but it's very relaxed," reads a forum post. "This subreddit doesn't understand that there are players who actually go outside and don't play this game all the time. Allow them to strike a balance," states another. A response via social media explains that as they're "a parent gamer with busy schedules, this is great for me," and someone else praises the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Constructive Concerns and Community Feedback

All that said, there are valid points to complain about Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have pointed out that it will make queue times more extended for different playlists due to the large amount of options currently available. Similarly, certain regions already encounter AI-filled matches in the current modes. It also seems a little backwards that the mode won't start without a minimum number of real players, despite it primarily centers on combat against bots.

Finally, a major grievances is that a previous feature was meant to offer complete rewards, even against bots, but that was removed when they attempted to remove XP farming from the mode. Thus this new playlist feels like the community meeting them in the middle, as per a Reddit comment. A different user describes this mode as the developers "making a mistake so hard, I experienced so much fun in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to change it?"

Future Prospects: Adjustments Be Made?

Should Battlefield Studios has proven anything so far with the latest installment, it's that they're paying attention and responding to feedback. Assignments being too difficult got fixed rapidly, just like the required Redsec challenges. It is likely that, if their data shows this recent mode is underperforming to their standards, they won't be shy to make further modifications.